Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sourcegenned field deltas #5155

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

metalgearsloth
Copy link
Contributor

@metalgearsloth metalgearsloth commented May 20, 2024

Was easiest thing to do and some stuff like physics + solutions + transform will need their own solutions but this makes generic stuff like hunger, guns, thirst easier. It's also setup so it shouldn't be too hard to do field deltas for transform / physics in a generic way for some stuff.

The other benefit is we can network a lot more stuff (e.g. VVable fields) and not worry about states bloating out.

Branched from electro's delta branch.

One thing I'm not sure on is how to handle backwards compatibility short of making every single dirty call a field-level one for a component.

I checked out net_graph and there is a noticeable drop for hunger + thirst but not sure how else to profile it (obviously CPU wise I expect it would be slower marginally, just due to having to check if it's a delta state or not). With that being said if it's like a single bool component or small it's probably faster to just do a full dirty and not use deltas due to the List overhead (though not sure how it gets serialized).

image

On master the 2 spikes go up to the same point but with field deltas one noticeably drops a lot.

Okay so I measured it:
477 payload size vs 97 for 4 hunger states. Gun states went down by ~80 per state. Most of the time it's not going to be worth it but if we know there's a big component state like guns or something else that updates frequently (e.g. UI component) or something we can do specific implementations for in hotpaths (i.e. transform and physics with specific deltas without the List<T> overhead) then it'll give big savings.

RELEASE-NOTES.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…deltas

# Conflicts:
#	Robust.Shared/GameObjects/Components/Eye/EyeComponent.cs
@metalgearsloth
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay new big-brain idea to make it much smaller.
Just use a bitmask of changed fields and cap it at 32. That way we can just serialize the array instead and not a corresponding int to every field.

@metalgearsloth metalgearsloth marked this pull request as draft August 9, 2024 08:19
…deltas

# Conflicts:
#	Robust.Shared/Physics/Systems/SharedPhysicsSystem.Components.cs
@metalgearsloth metalgearsloth marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2024 03:34
@ElectroJr
Copy link
Member

Mind if I push changes that make IComponentDelta implement/inherit from IComponent, so that the if (delta is not IComponent component) check and some of the casts can just be removed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants